Even though my gut instict is telling me not to 'fuel the fire' here, the urge is just too great. Just please keep in mind that I am
not trying to start a huge debate about mollies and salt, and my last intention here is to say "I am right, you are wrong". With that in mind....
Quote:
|
Whilst certain magazine articles "debunk" theories, I would like to remind everyone that the majority of these articles are based on one persons opinion and experience
|
I couldnt agree more with you pappyy3. While I am not trying to say that this article I referred to can be considered as being the aquatic bible, I will say that in this instance, the portion of the article I bring up here seems to be based more on a factual basis, versus other articles which detail topics that can vary from person to person since they are more opinionated.
Quote:
|
articles claim that bristle nose catfish do not tolerate salts in their water
|
I have to say that I agree with the idea that catfish cannot tolerate salt...but only about half way. For example, I know quite a few hobbyists who use salt in his or her tank, in fact, I also do the same and have a BN pleco....however, it is commonly suggested that the addition of salt may irritate scaleless fish, and so it is also suggested that the 'normal' dose of salt be cut in half. To add to that, the method in which you add the salt also plays a role in your ability to reduce the risk of this irritation.
Quote:
|
The point I'm trying to make is that habbyists should never be afraid to try something different (within reason)
|
I am glad that you put the 'within reason' at the end of your comment here; and I completely agree with you.
As I mentioned in an earlier post, I am not trying to say that every hobbyist should or could add salt to a molly tank; conversely, I am also not trying to say that no one should ever add salt to a livebearer/molly tank. I am just trying to point out that you would probably be ok regardless of if you add salt or skip it entirely (again, within reason). Make sense?